Lindy

One lead-generation run — a knowledge base search, an email, a follow-up call — can burn 275 credits, meaning the Pro plan's entire monthly allowance can vanish in roughly 18 leads. One reviewer's take: "simultaneously underpriced and overpriced."

Automation · AI Agents, Task Automation · 4.4 ★

What is Lindy?

Lindy, founded in 2022 by Flo Crivello and backed by $54 million in total funding, positions itself as a no-code "AI employee" platform rather than a traditional automation tool — the honest distinction from Zapier or Make, both covered elsewhere in this directory, is that those platforms chain pre-defined if-this-then-that rules, while Lindy's agents use large language models to make contextual decisions, handle exceptions, and adapt to messy real-world inputs. You describe what you want in plain English, and Lindy assembles a working agent connected to Gmail, Outlook, Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, and 5,000-6,000+ other integrations depending on the source, capable of triaging an inbox and drafting replies in your voice, coordinating meeting scheduling, joining calls to take notes and extract action items, and updating CRM records from the context of those interactions. A genuinely sensible safety default: agents draft messages and wait for your approval before sending, rather than firing communications autonomously — a real, practical guardrail worth appreciating. Gaia, Lindy's voice agent powered by Deepgram Flux transcription, achieves sub-second turn detection and claims a latency advantage of 500+ milliseconds over competitors (a vendor figure worth testing yourself if phone-based support is a priority), billed at $0.19 per minute with GPT-4o processing. Autopilot, launched with Lindy 3.0 in August 2025, gives agents a virtual cloud computer with access to a web browser, spreadsheet software, and desktop applications — letting them operate web apps that have no API at all.

The genuinely important, concrete thing worth understanding clearly about Lindy's real-world cost before committing budget: it charges based on compute intensity, meaning a simple task consumes far fewer credits than a complex, multi-step workflow, and the gap between those can be dramatic. One detailed cost breakdown walks through a real lead-generation example: an agent that searches your knowledge base (3 credits), sends a qualification email (7 credits), and makes a follow-up phone call (265 credits) burns through 275 credits for a single lead — meaning on the Pro plan specifically, your entire monthly credit allowance can be exhausted in roughly 18 leads, making the effective cost meaningfully higher than the advertised monthly price suggests. One reviewer's blunt, genuinely sharp summary captures the tension well: "Lindy is simultaneously underpriced and overpriced at $49.99/mo. The platform itself is a steal for what it does. But the credit system turns a predictable subscription into a variable cost that scales unpredictably." It's also worth knowing Lindy repriced significantly in early 2026 — the free tier and an older $299 Business plan are both gone, so any pricing guide referencing those predates the current structure.

⚠️
275 credits for one lead, ~18 leads/month cap
A follow-up call alone consumes 265 credits, dominating the total cost
💬
"Simultaneously underpriced and overpriced"
A genuinely sharp, honest characterization of the credit-based cost model
🔄
Repriced entirely in early 2026
Free tier and the old $299 Business plan are both gone
✅
Drafts wait for your approval before sending
A genuinely sensible default guardrail against fully unattended communication

The 275-credit lead example and the "18 leads" depletion math are drawn directly from a detailed independent 2026 pricing breakdown (Ringg AI, a competing voice-agent vendor, whose figures are presented alongside appropriate context). The "simultaneously underpriced and overpriced" verdict and Reddit-sourced friction points are drawn from a separate independent review aggregating real user feedback (Prospeo). The early-2026 repricing and removal of the free tier are confirmed by an independent comparative source (UseCarly).

Key features

🧠

Context-aware, no-code agents

Handles ambiguous situations and adapts dynamically, unlike rigid if-this-then-that rules.

📧

Inbox triage & drafting

Reads and drafts replies in your voice, waiting for approval before sending.

🎙️

Gaia voice agent

Sub-second latency phone agent powered by Deepgram Flux, billed per minute.

🖥️

Autopilot (Computer Use)

A virtual cloud computer letting agents operate web apps with no API.

📅

Meeting notes & CRM updates

Joins calls, extracts action items, and updates HubSpot or Salesforce automatically.

📚

100+ agent templates

Covers common use cases like lead research, support, and email triage out of the box.

Available models

Gaia (Deepgram Flux + GPT-4o) Voice agent with sub-second turn detection, billed at $0.19/minute

Integrations & platforms

Gmail, Outlook, Slack HubSpot, Salesforce 5,000-6,000+ total integrations

Pros, cons & best for

👍

Pros

  • Genuinely context-aware agents that handle ambiguity, not just rigid rules
  • Approval-before-sending is a real, sensible safety default
  • Broad template library gets non-developers to a working agent fast
👎

Cons

  • Voice-heavy workflows can genuinely deplete an entire month's credits in ~18 leads
  • Credit-based billing turns a predictable subscription into unpredictable variable cost
  • Loop debugging is difficult, per real user reports, when an agent misbehaves
🎯

Best for

  • Founders and operators drowning in email, scheduling, and follow-up work
  • Sales and CS teams automating meeting prep and CRM hygiene, text-first
  • Not the pick for heavy, predictable voice-call volume — model your credits first

Take a look inside

Our verdict

4.4 / 5

Lindy's genuine strength is real: context-aware, no-code agents that handle ambiguous, messy real-world tasks — email triage, meeting notes, CRM hygiene — meaningfully better than rigid if-this-then-that automation, and the approval-before-sending default reflects real, sensible product judgment about where AI autonomy should stop. The honest, unavoidable tension worth internalizing clearly, captured well by one reviewer's blunt phrase — "simultaneously underpriced and overpriced" — is that the credit-based billing model can turn what looks like a predictable $49.99 or $99.99 subscription into a genuinely variable cost, especially once voice calls enter the workflow; a single lead with a follow-up call can burn through 275 credits, and Pro's entire monthly allowance can vanish in roughly 18 such leads. For founders and operators drowning in text-based knowledge work specifically, Lindy remains a genuinely strong, well-regarded choice; for voice-heavy workflows, model your real credit consumption carefully before committing, or compare directly against a dedicated voice-agent platform.

FAQ

Why can Lindy's Pro plan run out of credits so quickly?

Because billing is based on compute intensity, and voice calls consume dramatically more credits than text actions — a single lead workflow with a knowledge base search, an email, and a follow-up call can burn 275 credits, meaning the entire monthly allowance can be exhausted in roughly 18 such leads.

Does Lindy still have a free plan?

No, Lindy repriced significantly in early 2026, removing both the free tier and an older $299 Business plan — only a 7-day free trial with full Plus-feature access remains.

How is Lindy different from Zapier or Make?

Zapier and Make chain predefined if-this-then-that rules, while Lindy's agents use large language models to make contextual decisions, handle exceptions, and adapt to ambiguous, messy real-world situations rather than following rigid logic.

What is Gaia?

Lindy's voice agent, powered by Deepgram Flux transcription with sub-second turn detection, billed at $0.19 per minute with GPT-4o processing, and integrated with the rest of the platform to update CRM records and trigger workflows from voice interactions.

Does Lindy send emails automatically without oversight?

No, by default agents draft messages and wait for your approval before sending — a genuinely sensible safety guardrail rather than fully unattended communication.

Is Lindy good for voice-heavy lead generation?

Its lead-related capabilities are primarily text-based rather than voice-native, and voice calls via Gaia consume credits fast enough that heavy call volume can deplete a monthly plan quickly — model your expected usage carefully or consider a dedicated voice-agent platform instead.